1. De Sio M, Autorino R, Quarto G, Damiano R, Perdona S, Lorenzo G, Mordente S, D’Armiento M. Gyrus bipolar versus standard monopolar transurethral resection of the prostate: A randomized prospective trial. Urology 2006; 67: 69-72.

2. Nuhoglu B, Ayyildiz A, Karaguzel E, Cebeci O, Germiyanoglu C. Plasmakinetic prostate resection in the treatment of benign prostate hyperplasia: Results of 1-year follow up. Int J Urol 2006; 13(1): 21-4.

3. Patankar S, Jamkar A, Dobhada S, Gorde V. PlasmaKinetic superpulse transurethral resection versus conventional transurethral resection of prostate. J Endourol 2006; 20: 215-219.

4. Tefekli A, Muslumanoglu A, Baykal M, Binbay M, Tas A, Altunrende F. A hybrid technique using bipolar energy in TURP surgery. J Urol 2005; 174: 1339-43.

5. Uria J, Zapata O, Zalabardo J, Benito A, Conejos J. Transurethral resection with saline solution: a technological achievement not yet assimilated by the urological community. Arch Esp Urol 2005; 58(4): 335-45.

6. Wu WJ, Wang XH, Wang HP, Zou WB, Liang XY, Cai ZG, Zhong WW, Zou YF, Yuan DZ. Therapeutic efficacy of bipolarp plasmakinetic technique compared with transurethral resection on BPH. Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2005; 85(47): 3365-7.

7. Yang S, Lin W, Chang H, Hsu J, Lin W, Chow Y, Tsai W, Lee T, Lo K, Chow K, Chen M. Gyrus plasmasect: Is it better than monopolar TURP? Urol Int 2004; 73(3): 258-61.

8. Dunsmuir WD, McFarlane JP, Tan A, Dowling C, Downie J, Kourambas J, Donnellan S, Redgrave N, Fletcher R, Frydenberg M, Love C. Gyrus bipolar electrovaporization vs transurethral resection of the prostate: a randomised prospective single blind 1 yr follow up. Prostate Cancer and Prostate Diseases 2003; 6(2): 182-6.

9. Fung B, Li S, Yu C, Lau B, Hou S. Prospective randomized controlled trial comparing plasmakinetic vaporesection and conventional transurethral resection of the prostate. Asian Journal of Surgery 2005; 28: 24-28.

10. Hon N, Hussain Z, Ghiblawi S, Brace H, Hayne D, Coppinger S. W. V. A prospective, randomized trial comparing conventional transurethral prostate resection with plasmakinetic vaporization of the prostate: physiological changes, early complications and long-term follow up. J Urol 2006; 176: 205-209.

11. Karaman M I, Kaya C, Ozturk M, Gurdal M, Kirecci S, Pirincci N. Comparison of TUVP using PK energy and TURP 1 year follow up. J Endourol 2005; 19: 734-737.

12. Botto H, Lebret T, Barre P, Orsoni J, Herve J, Lugagne P. Electrovaporisation of prostate with Gyrus device. J Endourol 2001; 15: 313-316.

13. Candau B, Zalabardo JM, Beltran B, Perez L, Uria V. Transurethral prostatic resection with bipolar scalpel. Actas Urol Esp 2004; 28(2): 147-51.

14. Dincel C, Samli M, Guler C, Demirbas, M. Plasmakinetic Vaporization of prostate: clinical evaluation of new technique. J Endourol 2004; 19: 293-298.

15. Eaton A.C, Francis R.N. The provision of transurethral prostatectomy on a day case basis using bipolar plasma kinetic technology. BJU Intl 2002; 89: 534-537.

16. Gilleran J, Thaly R, Chernoff A. Bipolar plasmakinetic transurethral resection of the prostate: reliable training vehicle for today's urology residents. J Endourol 2006; 20: 683-687.

17. Gu X, Zhu Q, Zhang P, Lu Z, Xu Y, Huang S. Diagnosis and treatment of incidental prostate cancer following TUPVP-a report of 15 cases. Zhonghua Nan Ke Xue 2004; 10(11): 849-50, 854.

18. Issa M, Young M, Bullock A, Bouet R, Petros J. Dilutional hyponaturemia TURP syndrome. urology 2004; 64(2): 298–301.

19. Lai J, Xia Q, Xu S, Zheng D, Zhao G, Guan F. Transurethral bipolar PK prostatectomy for BPH. Zhonghua Nan Ke Xue 2004; 10(7): 488-90.

20. Pu X, Wang X, Wang H, Hu L. Erectile dysfunction after plasmakinetic vaporization of the prostate: Incidence and Risk Factors. J Endourol 2006; 20: 693-697.

21. Song XS, Che XY, Wang JB, He ZZ, Jiang T, Yin JB, Zhang RK. TURP with bipolar plasmakinetic technique for BPH. Zhonghua Nan Ke Xue 2005; 11(2): 140-144

22. Starkman JS, Santucci R. Comparison Gyrus TURP vs. standard TURP. BJU Intl 2005; 95(1): 69-71.

23. Zheng SB, Liu CX, Xu YW. Application of intracavity retrograde dissection in TURP. Di Yi Da Xue Xue Bao 2005; 25(6): 734-5, 738

24. Neill M, Gilling P, Kennett K, Frampton C, Westenberg A, Fraundorfer M, Wilson L. Randomized trial comparing holmium laser enucleation of prostate with plasmakinetic enucleation of prostate for the treatment of BPH. Urology 2006; 68(5): 1020-1024.

25. Bird V, Reese J, Winfield H. Identification and dissection of bladder neck during laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Urology 2002; 60(4): 680-681.

26. Lagerveld B, Koot R, Smits G. Thermal artifacts in bladder tumor following loop endoresection: electrovaporization v electrocauterization. J of Endourol 2004; 18: 583-586.

27. Lee D, Sharp V, Konety B. Use of bipolar power source for transurethral resection of bladder tumor in patient with implanted pacemaker. Urology 2005; 66(1): 194-195.

28. Moy M.L., Burke M, Stephen S. Histological effects of the GYRUS resection system versus standard electrocautery resection in the treatment of bladder tumors.

29. Wang D, Bird V, Leonard V, Plumb S, Konety B, Williams R, Winfield H. Use of bipolar energy for transurethral resection of bladder tumors: Pathological Considerations. J Endourology 2004; 18: 578-582.

30. Abbaraju J, Challacombe B.J., Abu-Asi M, Sriprasad. The outcome of Gyrus TURP in a district general hospital. WCE, 2006

31. Bazo A, Barnes D, Butterworth D. The Heat is on, Plasmakinetic Vaporization of the Prostate (PKVP): Thermal Tissue Injury Comparison with TURP. J Endourology Oct 2001; 15: 71-94.

32. Brancato, T, Corvese F, Baffigo G, Aloisi P, Alvaro R, Valenti P. Safety and efficacy of Gyrus PlasmaKinetic bipolar energy in transurethral resection of the prostate. SIU 2006; MP-21.06.

33. Chandrasekar, P, Kapasi F, Virdi J. A Prospective randomized study between transurethral vaporization using PK energy and TURP-5 year results. AUA 2006; 510. WCE 2006;VP12-05.

34. Choi S, Lee J, Seo J, Yoon C, Moon K, Park Y, Cho S. The comparison of PK Tissue management system TURP with conventional monopolar TURP. EAU 2006; 994.

35. Chua WJ, Tibung MJB, Consigliere D. Day surgery transurethral resection of prostate: our initial experience. Urology November 2006; 68: 8. SIU PD-02.10.

36. Coppinger S, Hon Y, Brathwaite D, Hussain Z, Ghiblawi S, Brace H, Hayne D, Ibrahim H. Physiological changes, early complications and long term outcome of bipolar plasmakinetic vaporisation of the prostate(PKV): comparison with standard TURP. AUA 2006; 14.

37. Eaton AC, Francis RN, Duncan NH, De Silva B. A randomised prospective study comparing the performance of the 4mm plasma kinetic loop resection against standard monopolar TURP in prostates 40 – 100g size. 2004.

38. Eaton AC, Francis RN, De Silva B. Catheter-free, day case prostatectomy using the gyrus superpulse and supersect loop. BAUS 2004.

39. Eaton AC. Day case prostatectomy employing the gyrus plasmakinetic bipolar system. J Endourology September 2002; 16: A126.

40. Eaton AC, Duncan NC. Gyrus PK bipolar loop resection compared to conventional monopolar TURP in prostates >40 grams. J Endourology September 2002; 16: A126.

41. Gilleran JP, Thaly RK, Chernoff AM. Safety of bipolar electrocautery TURP: preliminary findings. J Endourology September 2003; 17: 337-359.

42. Gilling PJ, Westenberg A.M, Wilson L, Fraundorfer M. Plasmakinetic superpulse TUR compared plasmakinetic enucleation of the prostate. WCE 2006; BR4-08.

43. Gordon SJ, Watson G. Randomised three way trial of prostate enucleation techniques using thulium and holmium lasers and PlasmaKinetic energy. AUA 2006; 1527.

44. Gurbuz, C, Basaran A, Yildirim A, Atsu N, Tokuc N. Use of bipolar energy in the treatment of urethral stricture: preliminary results. White Paper.

45. Huri E, Akgl T, Ayy ld z, A. Comparison of Plasmakinetic Prostate Resection (PKRP) with open prostatectomy and classic TURP in treatment of BPH. WCE 2006; VP12-07.

46. Huri E, Akgl T. The relation between IPSS, uroflow, prostate volume, urethrocystoscopeic findings, total free PSA, and acute urinary retention risk in BPH. Opted with surgical treatment. WCE 2006; MP22-21.

47. Kilciler M, Bedir S, Demir E, Erian K, Ozgok Y. Transurethral prostatectomy with the bipolar plasmakinetic technique for BPH. WCE, 2006 BR4-05.

48. Kilinic, M, Arslan M, Balasar M, Guven S, Ozturk A, Yglmaz K. Plasmakinetic vaporization of the prostate. J Endourology September 2003;17: 1-275.

49. Kim D, Marchis C, Choi M, Williams S, Aboseif S. TURP using bipolar current versus the greenlight laser: an early experience.

50. Liu CX, Xu A, Zheng S, Zhou X, Zhang F. Transurethral bipolar electrovaporization of prostate for treatment of BPH with 800 Cases Report. J Endourology September 2003;17: 1-275.

51. McFarlane JP, Tan A, Kourambas J, Love C. Gyrus electrovaporisation and TURP: preliminary results of a prospective randomized trial. J November 2001; 15 Supp 1: A91.

52. Muslumanglu A, Baykal M, Sarilar O, Tefekli A, Berbergoglu Y, Merder E, Kabay S, Bay M. Pospective raomised study of electrovaporisation with Gyrus device (Plasmakinetic) and TURP in men with BPH: peliminary results. J Endourology September 2002; 16 Supplement 1: A126.

53. Ozer K, KozacGolu K, Bal F, Sengul A, Bolukbas G. The efficacy of Plasmakinetic TURP with axipolar electrocautery system in prostate adenomas greater than 45 grams. J Endourology September 2003; 17 supplement 1: 1-275.

54. Ruiz-Deya G, Hellstrom W, Thomas R. Minimally invasive treatment of BPH using a novel electrocautery system (Gyrus); A retrospective financial analysis versus standard monopolar resection. J Endourology 2002; 16 suppl 1: A25: 33-187.

55. Strup S, Moy L. Plasmakinetic vaporization and vaporesection of the prostate and bladder tissue. J Endourology November 2001;15 Supplement 1: A139.

56. Tan A, Snow RM. Benign prostate hyperplasia more than 100ml - is Gyrus TURP Superior to Open Prostatectomy? Society of International Urology, Honolulu, HI October, 2004.

57. Tan A, Rowe E, Razvi H. A comparison of the thermal and histological effects of bipolar and monopolar electrosurgical resection of the prostate in a canine model. J Endourology November 2004; 18 Supplement 1: A3-A22.

58. Tan A, Chen R. Prospective study: BPH gyrus loop vs. conventional TURP-2 year follow up. EAU 2006; 1153. WCE 2006; MP15-22.

59. Terrone C, Scoffone C, Cracco C, Poggio, M, Tarabuzzi R, Morra I, Cossu M, Ragni F, Scarpa R. Bipolar vs. monopolar TURP: A randomized study. EAU 2006; 849.

60. Virdi J, Chandrasekar P. A prospective randomised trial between transurethral vaporisation using PK energy & TURP. A prospective study. One-year follow-up.

61. Wang X, Pu X, Wang H, Luo Y, Feng Z, Qu L. Transurethral resection of the prostate using bipolar energy: 1000 cases report. AUA 2006; 1527.

62. Watson GM. A randomised study comparing holmium laser enucleation with bipolar plasma enucleation of the prostate. J Endourology September 2002; 16 Supplement 1: A51.

Download a
Brochure